After running a TV advertisement in China discussing the whitening effects of Crest brand toothpaste, Procter and Gamble (PandG) is facing a fine of nearly $1 million (USD) from the country’s health regulators who claim that the advertisement is a case of false advertising.
According to the New York Times, the Shanghai Administration for Industry and Commerce has accused the American company of “[overplaying] the effects of some of its toothpaste and [using] digital software to ‘touch up’ images used in advertising to make teeth look whiter.”
The International Business Times explains that the TV ad, which featured a popular Taiwanese talk show host, promised that the toothpaste would provide “one-day whitening;” it became clear after the advertisement had begun airing that Crest had digitally altered the color of the celebrity’s teeth — and Chinese authorities were not pleased.
The Times also states that the fine — which could be about $977,000 (6.03 Chinese renminbi) — is the largest recorded fine held against a company for false advertising.
Crest has reportedly stated, via its official Twitter account, that it pulled the ad from TV spots sometime around mid-2014 and that the fine was issued over a year ago.
Although Crest has emphasized that all of its products were “in compliance with the country’s law before entering the market,” the International Business Times has noted that Chinese authorities have begun to “[step] up scrutiny of both foreign and domestic companies that are misleading consumers.”
In the case of “one-day whitening” resulting from a toothpaste, the claim certainly is dubious at best; most consumers are already aware that few over-the-counter dental products can provide the same treatments that one would find in a professional dental clinic. But considering the rate at which oral hygiene products and cleaning technologies have developed over the past few years, it wouldn’t be surprising if consumers honestly believed that a toothpaste could have a noticeable whitening effect — especially if those consumers hadn’t done any research about the product before buying it.
Although this case against PandG could signal a major turning point in the Chinese advertising and marketing industry — should PandG agree to pay the fine — it still appears, one year after the fine has been issued, that the company still hasn’t decided whether to comply or contest the false advertising allegations.